GeForce Go 6200 vs ATI Radeon HD 4270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4270 and GeForce Go 6200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4270
2010
512 MB
0.26
+550%

HD 4270 outperforms Go 6200 by a whopping 550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14371568
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.19
ArchitectureRV6xx (2008−2010)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRS880MNV44 A2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 May 2010 (16 years ago)1 February 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores407
Core clock speed590 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data75 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data16 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.200
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4270 0.26
+550%
Go 6200 0.04

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4270 109
+627%
Samples: 25
Go 6200 15
Samples: 18

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Palworld 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Palworld 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+8.7%
21−24
−8.7%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Palworld 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+8.7%
21−24
−8.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+8.7%
21−24
−8.7%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 4K resolution and the Epic Preset, the ATI HD 4270 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI HD 4270 performs better in 15 tests (63%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (38%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.04
Recency 1 May 2010 1 February 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 110 nm

ATI HD 4270 has a 550% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 4270 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6200 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4270 or GeForce Go 6200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.