ATI FireGL V7350 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1410not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.90no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameRV620R520
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 February 2009 (17 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed594 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors181 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt111 Watt
Texture fill rate2.3769.600
Floating-point processing power0.04752 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs416
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed396 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.336 GB/s41.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 February 2009 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 111 Watt

ATI HD 4250 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 64% more advanced lithography process, and 344% lower power consumption.

ATI FireGL V7350, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4250 and FireGL V7350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4250 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7350 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 86 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4250 or FireGL V7350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.