UHD Graphics P750 vs ATI Radeon HD 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4200 and UHD Graphics P750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4200
2009
0.27

Graphics P750 outperforms HD 4200 by a whopping 1463% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1434733
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.76
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameRS880Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 August 2009 (17 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40256
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors181 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00083.20
Floating-point processing power0.04 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4200 0.27
UHD Graphics P750 4.22
+1463%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4200 111
Samples: 1302
UHD Graphics P750 1758
+1484%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Palworld 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Palworld 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Valorant 24−27
−1300%
350−400
+1300%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−1438%
200−210
+1438%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Palworld 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Valorant 24−27
−1300%
350−400
+1300%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Valorant 24−27
−1300%
350−400
+1300%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1433%
230−240
+1433%
Valorant 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 4.22
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics P750 has a 1463% higher aggregate performance score, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics P750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4200 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 307 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 64 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4200 or UHD Graphics P750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.