A100X vs ATI Radeon HD 4200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1434not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRS880GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2009 (17 years ago)28 June 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores406912
Core clock speed500 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors181 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000622.1
Floating-point processing power0.04 TFLOPS19.91 TFLOPS
ROPs4160
TMUs4432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared80 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1593 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2,039 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)N/A
Shader Model4.1N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.03.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2009 28 June 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm

A100X has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4200 and A100X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4200 is a desktop graphics card while A100X is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 307 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A100X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4200 or A100X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.