Radeon RX 7800 XT vs ATI HD 3870
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 3870 and Radeon RX 7800 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
7800 XT outperforms HD 3870 by a whopping 4330% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1078 | 47 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.05 | 70.10 |
| Power efficiency | 0.97 | 17.32 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) |
| GPU code name | RV670 | Navi 32 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 19 November 2007 (18 years ago) | 25 August 2023 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $269 | $499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
RX 7800 XT has 140100% better value for money than ATI HD 3870.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 3840 |
| Core clock speed | 777 MHz | 1295 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2430 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 666 million | 28,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 106 Watt | 263 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 12.43 | 583.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4973 TFLOPS | 37.32 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 96 |
| TMUs | 16 | 240 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 60 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 960 KB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 4 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 64 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR4 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1126 MHz | 2438 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.06 GB/s | 624.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial) | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 4−5
−98.1%
| 214 |
| 1440p | 2−3
−98.4%
| 123 |
| 4K | 1−2 | 72
+7100%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 67.25 | 2.33
+96.5%
|
| 1440p | 134.50 | 4.06
+97%
|
| 4K | 269.00 | 6.93
+97.4%
|
- RX 7800 XT has 97% lower cost per frame in 1080p
- RX 7800 XT has 97% lower cost per frame in 1440p
- RX 7800 XT has 97% lower cost per frame in 4K
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 324 | 324 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 351 | 351 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 248 | 248 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 243 | 243 |
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 355 | 355 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 196 | 196 |
| Far Cry 5 | 204 | 204 |
| Fortnite | 270−280 | 270−280 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 278 | 278 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| Valorant | 300−350 | 300−350 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 145 | 145 |
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 283 | 283 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280 | 270−280 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 163 | 163 |
| Far Cry 5 | 196 | 196 |
| Far Cry 6 | 203 | 203 |
| Fortnite | 270−280 | 270−280 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 261 | 261 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 178 | 178 |
| Metro Exodus | 172 | 172 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 366 | 366 |
| Valorant | 300−350 | 300−350 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 150 | 150 |
| Far Cry 5 | 182 | 182 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 222 | 222 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 200 | 200 |
| Valorant | 300−350 | 300−350 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 270−280 | 270−280 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 175 | 175 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 400−450 | 400−450 |
| Far Cry 6 | 150 | 150 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 140 | 140 |
| Metro Exodus | 106 | 106 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| Valorant | 350−400 | 350−400 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 99 | 99 |
| Far Cry 5 | 176 | 176 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 202 | 202 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 147 | 147 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 150−160 | 150−160 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 42 | 42 |
| Far Cry 6 | 87 | 87 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 152 | 152 |
| Metro Exodus | 63 | 63 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 118 | 118 |
| Valorant | 300−350 | 300−350 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45 | 45 |
| Far Cry 5 | 104 | 104 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 164 | 164 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100 | 95−100 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 75−80 | 75−80 |
This is how ATI HD 3870 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:
- RX 7800 XT is 5250% faster in 1080p
- RX 7800 XT is 6050% faster in 1440p
- RX 7800 XT is 7100% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.32 | 58.48 |
| Recency | 19 November 2007 | 25 August 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 106 Watt | 263 Watt |
ATI HD 3870 has 60% lower power consumption.
RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 4330% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 91% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3870 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
