Tesla M2050 vs ATI Radeon HD 3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1472not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRS780GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 March 2008 (18 years ago)25 July 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40448
Core clock speed494 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors180 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.97632.20
Floating-point processing power0.03952 TFLOPS1.03 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs456
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared3 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared773 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data148.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.01.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 March 2008 25 July 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm

Tesla M2050 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3200 and Tesla M2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3200 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla M2050 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 89 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Tesla M2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3200 or Tesla M2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.