Tesla K40m vs ATI Radeon HD 3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 3200 with Tesla K40m, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 3200
2008
0.20
Tesla K40m
2013, $7,699
12 GB GDDR5, 245 Watt
7.54
+3670%

K40m outperforms HD 3200 by a whopping 3670% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1472586
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Power efficiencyno data2.38
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRS780GK110B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 March 2008 (18 years ago)22 November 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores402880
Core clock speed494 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speedno data876 MHz
Number of transistors180 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data245 Watt
Texture fill rate1.976210.2
Floating-point processing power0.03952 TFLOPS5.046 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs4240
L1 Cacheno data240 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.01.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 3200 0.20
Tesla K40m 7.54
+3670%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3200 82
Samples: 1648
Tesla K40m 3143
+3733%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data69.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Palworld 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Palworld 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−3614%
260−270
+3614%
Valorant 24−27
−3650%
900−950
+3650%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−3650%
450−500
+3650%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Palworld 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−3614%
260−270
+3614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Valorant 24−27
−3650%
900−950
+3650%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−3614%
260−270
+3614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Valorant 24−27
−3650%
900−950
+3650%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−3567%
550−600
+3567%
Valorant 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

This is how ATI HD 3200 and Tesla K40m compete in popular games:

  • Tesla K40m is 3567% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 7.54
Recency 4 March 2008 22 November 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

Tesla K40m has a 3670% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla K40m is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3200 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K40m is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 89 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 21 votes

Rate Tesla K40m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3200 or Tesla K40m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.