ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330 vs ATI HD 3200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 3200 with Mobility Radeon HD 4330, including specs and performance data.
Mobility HD 4330 outperforms HD 3200 by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1474 | 1396 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | RS780 | M92 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 4 March 2008 (18 years ago) | 9 January 2009 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | 80 |
| Core clock speed | 494 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 180 million | 242 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 1.976 | 3.600 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.03952 TFLOPS | 0.072 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| TMUs | 4 | 8 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 64 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 9.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.0 (10_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 3
−33.3%
| 4−5
+33.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−16.7%
|
14−16
+16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how ATI HD 3200 and ATI Mobility HD 4330 compete in popular games:
- ATI Mobility HD 4330 is 33% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Fortnite, with 4K resolution and the Epic Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 4330 is 100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- ATI Mobility HD 4330 performs better in 9 tests (38%)
- there's a draw in 15 tests (63%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.20 | 0.32 |
| Recency | 4 March 2008 | 9 January 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 55 nm |
ATI Mobility HD 4330 has a 60% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.
The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 3200 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
