GeForce FX 5700 vs ATI Radeon HD 3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 3200 and GeForce FX 5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 3200
2008
0.20
+100%

HD 3200 outperforms FX 5700 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14721533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.31
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRS780NV36
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 March 2008 (18 years ago)23 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed494 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors180 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate1.9761.700
Floating-point processing power0.03952 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.0N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 3200 0.20
+100%
FX 5700 0.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3200 82
+105%
Samples: 1648
FX 5700 40
Samples: 24

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3
+200%
1−2
−200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Palworld 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Palworld 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Valorant 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Palworld 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Valorant 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Valorant 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Valorant 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

This is how ATI HD 3200 and FX 5700 compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 3200 is 200% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 0.10
Recency 4 March 2008 23 October 2003
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm

ATI HD 3200 has a 100% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5700 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 89 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 77 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3200 or GeForce FX 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.