ATI FirePro V9800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1015not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameR600Cypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 May 2007 (19 years ago)9 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $3,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201600
Core clock speed743 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors720 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate11.8968.00
Floating-point processing power0.4755 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1680
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed828 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth106.0 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)4.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 9 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 250 Watt

ATI HD 2900 XT has 16% lower power consumption.

ATI V9800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 XT and FirePro V9800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2900 XT is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V9800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 73 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 19 votes

Rate FirePro V9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2900 XT or FirePro V9800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.