ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1243not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.36no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameR600RV620
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 November 2007 (18 years ago)2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24040
Core clock speed601 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors720 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2121.600
Floating-point processing power0.2885 TFLOPSno data
ROPs124
TMUs124
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x VHDCI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 32 Watt

ATI 2450 Multi-View has a 45% more advanced lithography process, and 369% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 GT and FirePro 2450 Multi-View. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2900 GT is a desktop graphics card while FirePro 2450 Multi-View is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2900 GT or FirePro 2450 Multi-View, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.