RTX A400 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 2600 PRO with RTX A400, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 2600 PRO
2007
512 MB DDR2, 35 Watt
0.51

RTX A400 outperforms HD 2600 PRO by a whopping 2710% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1311411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1322.19
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV630GA107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2007 (19 years ago)16 April 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120768
Core clock speed600 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1762 MHz
Number of transistors390 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80042.29
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs824
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 2600 PRO 0.51
RTX A400 14.33
+2710%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 2600 PRO 211
Samples: 300
RTX A400 5972
+2730%
Samples: 712

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 14.33
Recency 28 June 2007 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

ATI HD 2600 PRO has 43% lower power consumption.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has a 2710% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 713% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2600 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2600 PRO is a desktop graphics card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 261 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 55 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2600 PRO or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.