GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV vs Radeon Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking978not rated
Place by popularity13not in top-100
Power efficiency9.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRenoirG71
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data12 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speedno data575 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data278 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate42.0013.80
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPSno data
ROPs816
TMUs2824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-IV
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data44.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL4.62.1.2 (full) 3.x (partial)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

Graphics has a 1186% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop graphics card while GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 8563 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics or GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.