Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Radeon Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Graphics
15 Watt
1.82

7-Cores iGPU outperforms Graphics by a whopping 735% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking985395
Place by popularity8not in top-100
Power efficiency9.46no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameRenoirMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data14 December 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4487
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate42.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
OpenGL4.6no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−88.2%
34

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90 90
Cyberpunk 2077 32 32
Hogwarts Legacy 31 31
Resident Evil 4 Remake 36 36

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Counter-Strike 2 58 58
Cyberpunk 2077 27 27
Far Cry 5 38 38
Fortnite 85−90 85−90
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 60−65
Hogwarts Legacy 27 27
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60
Valorant 120−130 120−130

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Counter-Strike 2 31 31
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210 200−210
Cyberpunk 2077 23 23
Far Cry 5 34 34
Fortnite 85−90 85−90
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 60−65
Grand Theft Auto V 23 23
Hogwarts Legacy 17 17
Metro Exodus 30−35 30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52 52
Valorant 120−130 120−130

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 22 22
Far Cry 5 35 35
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 60−65
Hogwarts Legacy 13 13
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22 22

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 85−90

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33 30−33
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120 110−120
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 24−27
Metro Exodus 18−20 18−20
Valorant 140−150 140−150

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 40−45
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 14−16
Far Cry 5 30−35 30−35
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 35−40
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 21−24

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40 35−40

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 12−14
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 27−30
Metro Exodus 12−14 12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 21−24
Valorant 75−80 75−80

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 21−24
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 6−7
Far Cry 5 16−18 16−18
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 27−30
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 9−10
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 14−16

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 14−16

This is how Graphics and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 750% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.82 15.20
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 735% higher aggregate performance score, and a 29% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 8584 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 114 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics or Arc 7-Cores iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.