Rubin Ultra GPU vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking744not rated
Place by popularity81not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameRaphaelGR110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 September 2022 (3 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12857344
Core clock speedno data700 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistorsno data670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data3600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4,062.5
Floating-point processing powerno data260 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data1792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cacheno data112 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 6.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM4e
Maximum RAM amountno data1024 GB
Memory bus widthno data32768 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data31.1 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_2N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm

Rubin Ultra GPU has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 393 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.