Tesla D870 vs Radeon Graphics 512SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRenoirG80
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 March 2020 (6 years ago)2 May 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512128 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt520 Watt
Texture fill rate67.2038.40 ×2
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs824 ×2
TMUs3232 ×2
L2 Cacheno data96 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1536 MB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 March 2020 2 May 2007
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 520 Watt

Graphics 512SP has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1186% more advanced lithography process, and 3367% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 512SP and Tesla D870. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 512SP is a desktop graphics card while Tesla D870 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 99 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla D870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 512SP or Tesla D870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.