Quadro NVS 280 PCI vs Radeon Graphics 512SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1578
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.12
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRenoirNV34 B1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 March 2020 (6 years ago)28 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed400 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate67.201.100
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 March 2020 28 October 2003
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

Graphics 512SP has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 2043% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 PCI, on the other hand, has 15% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 512SP and Quadro NVS 280 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 512SP is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 280 PCI is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 99 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 14 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 512SP or Quadro NVS 280 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.