Radeon RX 9050 OEM vs Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameRenoirNavi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)28 July 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201024
Core clock speed400 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt92 Watt
Texture fill rate28.00166.4
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPSno data
ROPs864
TMUs2064
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data144.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 28 July 2026
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 92 Watt

Graphics 320SP has 513% lower power consumption.

RX 9050 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and Radeon RX 9050 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9050 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 9050 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or Radeon RX 9050 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.