Quadro NVS 210S vs Radeon Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.42
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRenoirC51
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)22 December 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed400 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt11 Watt
Texture fill rate28.000.85
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs202

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)3.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 22 December 2003
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 11 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 210S, on the other hand, has 36% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and Quadro NVS 210S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 210S is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 210S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or Quadro NVS 210S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.