GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs Radeon Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRenoirGT200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)8 December 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320192
Core clock speed400 MHz518 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate28.0033.15
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS0.4147 TFLOPS
ROPs828
TMUs2064
L2 Cacheno data224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1792 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared448 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1008 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.9 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 8 December 2009
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 10 years, a 829% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and GeForce GTX 260 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 260 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or GeForce GTX 260 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.