FirePro W6150M vs Radeon E9260 PCIe

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated661
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameBaffinSaturn
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date27 September 2016 (9 years ago)12 November 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896768
Core clock speed1090 MHz1075 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate57.6051.60
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS1.651 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4848
L1 Cache224 KB192 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s88 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 September 2016 12 November 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

E9260 PCIe has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E9260 PCIe and FirePro W6150M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E9260 PCIe is a notebook graphics card while FirePro W6150M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E9260 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W6150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E9260 PCIe or FirePro W6150M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.