Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon E8860

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E8860 with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, including specs and performance data.

Radeon E8860
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 37 Watt
4.03
+5.5%

E8860 outperforms Pro Graphics P6300 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking750769
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.4319.70
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameVenusBroadwell GT3e
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 January 2014 (12 years ago)5 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed575 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed625 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0038.40
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs166
TMUs4048
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.80

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon E8860 4.03
+5.5%
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 3.82

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon E8860 1680
+5.6%
Samples: 14
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1591
Samples: 21

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 3.82
Recency 25 January 2014 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon E8860 has a 5% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 147% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon E8860 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300.

Be aware that Radeon E8860 is a notebook graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon E8860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E8860 or Iris Pro Graphics P6300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.