Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M vs Radeon E6760

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking942not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Power efficiency3.51no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameTurksGL40
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 May 2011 (15 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48010
Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate14.40no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed3200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.010
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL1.2no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2011 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm

Radeon E6760 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E6760 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E6760 is a desktop graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon E6760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 204 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E6760 or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.