Tegra 2 GPU vs ATI Radeon DDR VIVO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameRage 6Tegra 2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 August 2001 (24 years ago)3 June 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed183 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data400 MHz
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rate1.0981.600
ROPs24
TMUs64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed183 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth5.856 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.0N/A
OpenGL1.3ES 2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2001 3 June 2010
Chip lithography 180 nm 40 nm

Tegra 2 GPU has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon DDR VIVO and Tegra 2 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon DDR VIVO is a desktop graphics card while Tegra 2 GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon DDR VIVO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 2 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon DDR VIVO or Tegra 2 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.