CMP 40HX vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated272
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.64
Power efficiencyno data9.68
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameR350TU106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data25 February 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed380 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors117 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)94 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate3.040237.6
Floating-point processing powerno data7.603 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs8144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed680 MBps1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.76 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 94 Watt 185 Watt

ATI 9800 PRO MAXX has 97% lower power consumption.

CMP 40HX, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX and CMP 40HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX is a desktop graphics card while CMP 40HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 75 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX or CMP 40HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.