Quadro FX 3000G vs ATI Radeon 9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1512not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.27no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameR300NV35
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 July 2002 (24 years ago)22 July 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed275 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors110 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.2003.200
ROPs84
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 8x
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsFloppy1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed270 MHz425 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.28 GB/s27.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)9.0a
OpenGL2.01.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 22 July 2003
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm

FX 3000G has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9700 and Quadro FX 3000G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9700 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 3000G is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9700 or Quadro FX 3000G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.