TITAN V CEO Edition vs ATI Radeon 9250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1620114
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.62
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV280GV100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 March 2004 (22 years ago)21 June 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed240 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors36 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.96465.6
Floating-point processing powerno data14.9 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs4320
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data10 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount64 MB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz848 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s868.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9250 2
Samples: 123
TITAN V CEO Edition 16987
+849250%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2004 21 June 2018
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

TITAN V CEO Edition has an age advantage of 14 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9250 and TITAN V CEO Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 24 votes

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9250 or TITAN V CEO Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.