Quadro4 980 XGL vs ATI Radeon 9250

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking16121586
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameRV280NV28 A2
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2004 (22 years ago)12 November 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed240 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors36 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.962.400
ROPs48
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount64 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz325 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s10.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.18.1
OpenGL1.41.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9250 2
Samples: 123
Quadro4 980 XGL 5
+150%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2004 12 November 2002
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 128 MB

ATI 9250 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Quadro4 980 XGL, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9250 and Quadro4 980 XGL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9250 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro4 980 XGL is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 102 votes

Rate Quadro4 980 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9250 or Quadro4 980 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.