P104-100 vs ATI Radeon 9200 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1616548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRV280GP104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2003 (23 years ago)12 December 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1920
Core clock speed239 MHz1607 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1733 MHz
Number of transistors36 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Wattno data
Texture fill rate0.96208.0
Floating-point processing powerno data6.655 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4120
L1 Cacheno data720 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed164 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.248 GB/s320.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9200 PRO 2
Samples: 41
P104-100 3593
+179550%
Samples: 29

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 12 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm

P104-100 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 838% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 PRO and P104-100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop graphics card while P104-100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 70 votes

Rate P104-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9200 PRO or P104-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.