Tegra X1 vs ATI Radeon 9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1590not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.03no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameR200GM20B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2003 (23 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed250 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors60 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00016.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.512 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

Tegra X1 has a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 87% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9100 and Tegra X1. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 175 votes

Rate Tegra X1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9100 or Tegra X1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.