RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon 9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 9100 with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

ATI 9100
2003
64 MB DDR, 28 Watt
0.01
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022, $6,799
48 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
68.81
+688000%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms 9100 by a whopping 688000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking159221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.31
Power efficiency0.0317.77
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameR200AD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2003 (23 years ago)3 December 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data18176
Core clock speed250 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors60 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate2.0001,423
Floating-point processing powerno data91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs4192
TMUs8568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142
L1 Cacheno data17.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI 9100 0.01
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 68.81
+688000%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9100 5
Samples: 3
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28668
+573260%
Samples: 283

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1185
1440p-0−1161
4K-0−1108

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data36.75
1440pno data42.23
4Kno data62.95

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 210−220 210−220
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180 170−180
Resident Evil 4 Remake 210−220 210−220

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 210−220 210−220
Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180 170−180
Far Cry 5 130 130
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 270−280 270−280
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 400−450 400−450

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 210−220 210−220
Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180 170−180
Far Cry 5 126 126
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 270−280 270−280
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180 170−180
Metro Exodus 114 114
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 489 489
Valorant 400−450 400−450

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180 170−180
Far Cry 5 118 118
Forza Horizon 4 270−280 270−280
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 260 260
Valorant 400−450 400−450

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 210−220 210−220
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150 140−150
Metro Exodus 95 95
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 100−110
Far Cry 5 118 118
Forza Horizon 4 240−250 240−250
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 219 219

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Atomic Heart 65−70 65−70
Counter-Strike 2 40 40
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170 160−170
Metro Exodus 90 90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184 184
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 95−100 95−100
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 115 115
Forza Horizon 4 190−200 190−200
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 68.81
Recency 1 April 2003 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 300 Watt

ATI 9100 has 91% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 688000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, a 76700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 97% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 9100 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 131 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9100 or RTX 6000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.