GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs ATI Radeon 9000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1602not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.03no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV250G80
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (24 years ago)19 November 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data112
Core clock speed250 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors36 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00028.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs420
TMUs428
L2 Cacheno data80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB640 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 640 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 150 Watt

ATI 9000 has 436% lower power consumption.

8800 GTS 112, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9000 and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 36 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 310 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9000 or GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.