RTX A4500 Embedded vs ATI Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.65
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV250GA104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date14 March 2004 (22 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5888
Core clock speed275 MHz510 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1215 MHz
Number of transistors36 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate1.100223.6
Floating-point processing powerno data14.31 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs4184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cacheno data5.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 March 2004 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 80 Watt

ATI 9000 PRO Mac Edition has 186% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition and RTX A4500 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4500 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX A4500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition or RTX A4500 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.