RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded vs Radeon 890M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 890M with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 890M
2026
15 Watt
19.39
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded
8 GB GDDR7, 45 Watt
38.99
+101%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded outperforms 890M by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking322131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency100.0067.03
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGorgon PointGB206
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243328
Core clock speed400 MHz2160 MHz
Boost clock speed3100 MHz2662 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate198.4276.8
Floating-point processing powerno data17.72 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs64104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Cores1626
L0 Cache256 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB3.3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 890M 19.39
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded 38.99
+101%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 890M 8077
Samples: 2138
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded 16242
+101%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41
−95.1%
80−85
+95.1%
1440p17
−76.5%
30−35
+76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 117
−96.6%
230−240
+96.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Palworld 82
−95.1%
160−170
+95.1%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40−45
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85
−95.1%
160−170
+95.1%
Counter-Strike 2 91
−97.8%
180−190
+97.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Far Cry 5 57
−93%
110−120
+93%
Fortnite 100−110
−94.2%
200−210
+94.2%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−100%
160−170
+100%
Palworld 62
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−100%
150−160
+100%
Valorant 140−150
−98.6%
290−300
+98.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85
−95.1%
160−170
+95.1%
Counter-Strike 2 44
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−92.3%
450−500
+92.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Far Cry 5 53
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Fortnite 100−110
−94.2%
200−210
+94.2%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−100%
160−170
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 53
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−97.7%
85−90
+97.7%
Palworld 36
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−100%
150−160
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Valorant 140−150
−98.6%
290−300
+98.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
−95.1%
160−170
+95.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Far Cry 5 50
−100%
100−105
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−100%
160−170
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−100%
150−160
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−91.2%
65−70
+91.2%
Valorant 140−150
−98.6%
290−300
+98.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
−94.2%
200−210
+94.2%
Palworld 30
−100%
60−65
+100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−100%
80−85
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−97.2%
280−290
+97.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−91.2%
65−70
+91.2%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−76.5%
300−310
+76.5%
Valorant 170−180
−75.4%
300−310
+75.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
−96.4%
110−120
+96.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−93.9%
95−100
+93.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
Palworld 27−30
−85.2%
50−55
+85.2%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Palworld 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
Valorant 100−110
−92.3%
200−210
+92.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−91.2%
65−70
+91.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%
Palworld 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%

This is how Radeon 890M and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded is 95% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded is 76% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.39 38.99
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

Radeon 890M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded, on the other hand, has a 101% higher aggregate performance score.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 890M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 890M is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 316 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 890M or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.