GeForce GT 430 PCI vs Radeon 860M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking464not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency60.38no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameKrackan PointGF108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)11 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51296
Core clock speed600 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate96.0011.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs3216
Ray Tracing Cores8no data
L0 Cache128 KBno data
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.4N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 49 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 90% more advanced lithography process, and 69% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 860M and GeForce GT 430 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 430 PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 93 votes

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or GeForce GT 430 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.