GMA 3650 vs Radeon 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking538not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency45.90no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameKrackan PointCedarview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25632
Core clock speed400 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate46.402.560
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04096 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs164
Ray Tracing Cores4no data
L0 Cache64 KBno data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCI
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.1
Shader Model6.84.1
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.4N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

Radeon 840M has a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3650, on the other hand, has 15% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 840M and GMA 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 30 votes

Rate Radeon 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate GMA 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 840M or GMA 3650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.