ATI FireMV 2250 vs Radeon 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking538not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency45.90no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameKrackan PointRV516
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed400 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data105 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate46.402.400
ROPs84
TMUs164
Ray Tracing Cores4no data
L0 Cache64 KBno data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.83.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.4N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 32 Watt

Radeon 840M has a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 113% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 840M and FireMV 2250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 840M is a notebook graphics card while FireMV 2250 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 30 votes

Rate Radeon 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 840M or FireMV 2250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.