Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs Radeon 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking678not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.19no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)MUSA
GPU code nameKrackan Point 2Chunxiao
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1288192
Core clock speed400 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed2800 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate22.40768.0
Floating-point processing powerno data24.58 TFLOPS
ROPs4512
TMUs8512
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores2no data
L0 Cache32 KBno data
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data266 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data768.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.41.4
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 450 Watt

Radeon 820M has a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 2900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 820M and Moore Threads MTT S4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 820M is a notebook graphics card while Moore Threads MTT S4000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 47 votes

Rate Moore Threads MTT S4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 820M or Moore Threads MTT S4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.