GRID K100 vs Radeon 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking677not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.18no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameKrackan Point 2GK107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)28 June 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$63

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128192
Core clock speed400 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed2800 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate22.4013.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816
Ray Tracing Cores2no data
L0 Cache32 KBno data
L1 Cache32 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared891 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.51 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.41.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 130 Watt

Radeon 820M has a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 767% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 820M and GRID K100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 820M is a notebook graphics card while GRID K100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 820M or GRID K100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.