Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs 8065S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking85not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency65.83no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)GCN 5.0 (2017−2019)
GPU code nameGorgon HaloVega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 September 2026 (recently)3 December 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603584
Core clock speed1295 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate480.0336.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160224
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L0 Cache1.3 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MB896 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent6x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.41.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 September 2026 3 December 2017
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 230 Watt

Radeon 8065S has an age advantage of 8 years, a 71% more advanced lithography process, and 76% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8065S and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8065S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8065S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8065S or Radeon Pro WX 8100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.