Radeon Pro W6300M vs 8065S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking85not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency65.83no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)RDNA 2 (2021−2025)
GPU code nameGorgon HaloNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date28 September 2026 (less than a year ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed1295 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5.4 billion
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate480.097.92
ROPs6432
TMUs16048
Ray Tracing Cores4012
L0 Cache1.3 MB192 KB
L1 Cache1 MB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1024 KB
L3 Cache32 MB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared32 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.41.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 September 2026 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 25 Watt

Radeon 8065S has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 33% more advanced lithography process.

Pro W6300M, on the other hand, has 55% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8065S and Radeon Pro W6300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8065S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6300M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8065S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8065S or Radeon Pro W6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.