Radeon PRO W7900D vs 8065S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking85not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency65.79no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameGorgon HaloNavi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 September 2026 (less than a year ago)28 November 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25606144
Core clock speed1295 MHz1327 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz2156 MHz
Number of transistorsno data57.7 billion
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate480.0827.9
ROPs64192
TMUs160384
Ray Tracing Cores4096
L0 Cache1.3 MB3 MB
L1 Cache1 MB3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB6 MB
L3 Cache32 MB96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.41.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 September 2026 28 November 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 295 Watt

Radeon 8065S has an age advantage of 10 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 81% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8065S and Radeon PRO W7900D. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8065S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO W7900D is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8065S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon PRO W7900D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8065S or Radeon PRO W7900D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.