GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs Radeon 8065S

Place in the ranking	98	153
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	62.21	18.72
Architecture	RDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Gorgon Halo	TU104B
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2026 (recently)	29 January 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2944
Core clock speed	1295 MHz	1380 MHz
Boost clock speed	3000 MHz	1590 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	480.0	292.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	9.362 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160	184
Tensor Cores	no data	368
Ray Tracing Cores	40	46
L1 Cache	no data	2.9 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB
L3 Cache	32 MB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 5.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.8	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.4	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	170−180 +18.9%	143 −18.9%
1440p	110−120 +17%	94 −17%
4K	75−80 +15.4%	65 −15.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	240−250 +18.2%	200−210 −18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +24.7%	85−90 −24.7%
Palworld	120−130 +25.8%	95−100 −25.8%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	120−130 +27.8%	95−100 −27.8%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	140−150 +8.3%	132 −8.3%
Counter-Strike 2	240−250 +18.2%	200−210 −18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +24.7%	85−90 −24.7%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +35.6%	104 −35.6%
Fortnite	190−200 −7.9%	206 +7.9%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +16.3%	147 −16.3%
Palworld	120−130 +25.8%	95−100 −25.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −45.5%	243 +45.5%
Valorant	250−260 −10%	276 +10%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	140−150 +21.2%	118 −21.2%
Counter-Strike 2	240−250 +18.2%	200−210 −18.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +24.7%	85−90 −24.7%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +45.4%	97 −45.4%
Fortnite	190−200 +13%	169 −13%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +17.9%	145 −17.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	140−150 +40.6%	101 −40.6%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +21.1%	90 −21.1%
Palworld	120−130 +25.8%	95−100 −25.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −28.1%	214 +28.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 −3%	174 +3%
Valorant	250−260 −6%	266 +6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	140−150 +22.2%	117 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +24.7%	85−90 −24.7%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +46.9%	96 −46.9%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +23%	139 −23%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −4.2%	174 +4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +77.9%	95 −77.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	190−200 +23.2%	155 −23.2%
Palworld	120−130 +25.8%	95−100 −25.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +30.8%	90−95 −30.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	300−350 +23%	250−260 −23%
Grand Theft Auto V	95−100 +26.7%	75−80 −26.7%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +21.8%	55 −21.8%
Valorant	280−290 +10%	260 −10%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	110−120 −3.6%	115 +3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +31%	40−45 −31%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +34.1%	82 −34.1%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +8.2%	122 −8.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +33.8%	65−70 −33.8%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	120−130 −2.5%	124 +2.5%
Palworld	70−75 +27.3%	55−60 −27.3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +28.6%	40−45 −28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	100−110 +29.1%	75−80 −29.1%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +20%	35 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +13.8%	65 −13.8%
Valorant	270−280 +13.3%	240 −13.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	70−75 +5.9%	68 −5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +31.6%	18−20 −31.6%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +19.2%	52 −19.2%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +8.5%	82 −8.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 +8.2%	61 −8.2%

4K
Epic

Fortnite	60−65 +0%	61 +0%
Palworld	40−45 +24.2%	30−35 −24.2%

Full HD
High

Dota 2

131

+0%

131

+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2	125 +0%	125 +0%
Valorant	205 +0%	205 +0%

1440p
High

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

170−180

+0%

170−180

+0%

4K
High

Palworld

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

4K
Ultra

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Dota 2	119 +0%	119 +0%

This is how Radeon 8065S and RTX 2080 Mobile compete in popular games:

Radeon 8065S is 19% faster in 1080p
Radeon 8065S is 17% faster in 1440p
Radeon 8065S is 15% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 8065S is 78% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 Mobile is 46% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 8065S performs better in 47 tests (72%)
RTX 2080 Mobile performs better in 9 tests (14%)
there's a draw in 9 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	44.23	36.29
Chip lithography	4 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	150 Watt

Radeon 8065S has a 22% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 173% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8065S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon 8065S

Radeon 8060S

GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Radeon 8065S

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

AMD Radeon RX 9060

GeForce MX110

Intel Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

RX Vega 3

Intel Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)

GeForce MX350

Apple M5 Max 32-Core GPU

Quadro T1000 Mobile

Apple M5 Max 32-Core GPU

Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile

RTX 3060 Max-Q

NVIDIA GTX 980 SLI Mobile

TITAN X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

HD 6850 X2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8065S on a scale of 1 to 5:

4 180 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8065S or GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.