A30 PCIe vs Radeon 8065S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking79not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency66.60no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGorgon HaloGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 September 2026 (less than a year ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603584
Core clock speed1295 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz1440 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate480.0322.6
Floating-point processing powerno data10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs160224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L0 Cache1.3 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MB10.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB24 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared3072 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data933.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.4N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 September 2026 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 165 Watt

Radeon 8065S has an age advantage of 5 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 67% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8065S and A30 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8065S is a notebook graphics card while A30 PCIe is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 8065S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate A30 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8065S or A30 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.