Radeon R9 FURY X vs 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
820M 840M 860M 880M 890M 8040S 8050S 8060S RX 8040S RX 8060S
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
255 OEM 260 OEM 270 270 1024SP 270X 280 280X 280X2 285 290 290X 290X2 295X2 360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2 A375 Fury FURY X FURY X2 Nano

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S with Radeon R9 FURY X, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8060S
2025
55 Watt
43.01
+92.5%
R9 FURY X
2015, $649
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
22.34

8060S outperforms R9 FURY X by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
R9 FURY X R9 FURY X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking102293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.74
Power efficiency61.036.34
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameStrix HaloFiji
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)24 June 2015 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096
Compute unitsno data64
Core clock speed1295 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate464.0268.8
Floating-point processing powerno data8.602 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160256
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L0 Cache1.3 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MB1 MB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data195 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data+
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1050 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
CrossFire-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TressFX-+
TrueAudio-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.4+
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8060S 43.01
+92.5%
R9 FURY X 22.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8060S 18030
+92.5%
Samples: 1504
R9 FURY X 9366
Samples: 209

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 8060S 29499
+76.5%
R9 FURY X 16710

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10550−55
−52.4%
1440p53
+96.3%
27−30
4K32
+100%
16−18

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data12.98
1440pno data24.04
4Kno data40.56

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+96.7%
120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+106%
50−55
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+110%
50−55
Resident Evil 4 Remake 120−130
+102%
60−65

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
+103%
70−75
Counter-Strike 2 215
+95.5%
110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+106%
50−55
Far Cry 5 114
+107%
55−60
Fortnite 180−190
+96.8%
95−100
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+97.6%
85−90
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+110%
50−55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+94.1%
85−90
Valorant 250−260
+95.4%
130−140

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
+103%
70−75
Counter-Strike 2 109
+98.2%
55−60
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+98.6%
140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+106%
50−55
Far Cry 5 108
+96.4%
55−60
Fortnite 180−190
+96.8%
95−100
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+97.6%
85−90
Grand Theft Auto V 132
+103%
65−70
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+110%
50−55
Metro Exodus 100−110
+92.7%
55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+94.1%
85−90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 194
+94%
100−105
Valorant 250−260
+95.4%
130−140

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+103%
70−75
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+106%
50−55
Far Cry 5 100
+100%
50−55
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+97.6%
85−90
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+110%
50−55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+94.1%
85−90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+98.2%
55−60

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 180−190
+96.8%
95−100

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 71
+103%
35−40
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+93.1%
160−170
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+117%
35−40
Metro Exodus 65−70
+120%
30−33
Valorant 290−300
+93.3%
150−160

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+98.2%
55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+96.3%
27−30
Far Cry 5 88
+95.6%
45−50
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+96.9%
65−70
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+96.3%
27−30
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+113%
40−45

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+96.7%
60−65

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 36
+100%
18−20
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+97.5%
40−45
Metro Exodus 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+96.7%
30−33
Valorant 260−270
+105%
130−140

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+103%
35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+100%
12−14
Far Cry 5 50
+108%
24−27
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+93.3%
45−50
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+100%
14−16
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+113%
30−33

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+100%
30−33

This is how Radeon 8060S and R9 FURY X compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 110% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 96% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 43.01 22.34
Recency 6 January 2025 24 June 2015
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 275 Watt

Radeon 8060S has a 93% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 86% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 FURY X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 FURY X is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
vs
RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
R9 FURY X Radeon R9 FURY X
vs
RX 590 Radeon RX 590
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
vs
RX 6850M XT Radeon RX 6850M XT
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
M3000M M3000M
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
GTX 660M GTX 660M
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
GeForce 610M 610M
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
GTX 680 GTX 680
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
GTX 580 GTX 580
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
FirePro D300 D300
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
GTX 280 GTX 280
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
8800 GTX 8800 GTX
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
6800 Ultra 6800 Ultra
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
RX Vega 64 Nano RX Vega 64 Nano

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 201 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 92 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Radeon R9 FURY X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.