GeForce 256 DDR vs Radeon 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking100not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency60.89no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameStrix HaloNV10 A3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)23 December 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1295 MHz120 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million17 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm220 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate464.00.48
ROPs644
TMUs1604
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)7.0
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.4N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2025 23 December 1999
Chip lithography 4 nm 220 nm

Radeon 8060S has an age advantage of 25 years, and a 5400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8060S and GeForce 256 DDR. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 256 DDR is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 198 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 326 votes

Rate GeForce 256 DDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or GeForce 256 DDR, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.