Jetson Nano vs Radeon 780M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 368 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 46 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 83.81 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | Phoenix | GM20B |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 January 2024 (2 years ago) | March 2019 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $99 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 640 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 921 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 25,390 million | 2,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 20 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 139.2 | 14.74 |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.909 TFLOPS | 0.2358 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 16 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | no data |
| L0 Cache | 192 KB | no data |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x4 |
| Width | IGP | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | LPDDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Motherboard Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| CUDA | - | 5.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 20 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Radeon 780M has a 400% more advanced lithography process.
Jetson Nano, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon 780M and Jetson Nano. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon 780M is a desktop graphics card while Jetson Nano is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
