Arc A310E vs Radeon 780M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking368not rated
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Power efficiency83.81no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code namePhoenixDG2-128
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 January 2024 (2 years ago)April 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate139.264.00
Floating-point processing power8.909 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3216
TMUs4832
Ray Tracing Cores126
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1937 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data124.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 780M and Arc A310E. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2725 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc A310E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 780M or Arc A310E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.