Xclipse 960 GPU vs Radeon 760M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking443not rated
Place by popularity75not in top-100
Power efficiency65.76no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)MGFX4 (2026)
GPU code namePhoenixJuno
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 January 2024 (2 years ago)11 March 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed800 MHz985 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHzno data
Number of transistors25,390 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm2 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate83.1763.04
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1664
TMUs3264
Ray Tracing Cores816
L0 Cache128 KB256 KB
L1 Cache128 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6ES 3.2
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2024 11 March 2026
Chip lithography 4 nm 2 nm

Xclipse 960 GPU has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 760M and Xclipse 960 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a desktop graphics card while Xclipse 960 GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 530 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xclipse 960 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 760M or Xclipse 960 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.