Xclipse 940 GPU vs Radeon 680M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking510not rated
Place by popularity81not in top-100
Power efficiency14.95no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Magellan
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (3 years ago)31 January 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed2000 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate105.652.56
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3232
TMUs4848
Ray Tracing Cores1212
L0 Cache192 KB192 KB
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1024 KB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6ES 3.2
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Xclipse 940 GPU has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 680M and Xclipse 940 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1253 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Xclipse 940 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 680M or Xclipse 940 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.